‘Across a sample of 3080 protected areas where data from management effectiveness assessments is available, management varied from weak to effective, with about a third of them showing clear inadequacies. The overall mean score for management effectiveness was 0.53 on a scale of zero (completely ineffective management) to one (highly effective management). About 14% of the surveyed areas lacked basic requirements to operate effectively, and did not have an effective management presence. Strongest management factors recorded on average were gazettal, effectiveness of governance, threat monitoring, appropriateness of protected area design, conservation of values and marking of boundaries, while the weakest aspects of management included community benefit programs, funding reliability and adequacy, management effectiveness evaluation, facility and equipment maintenance, communication, and community involvement.’